1 in 5 people across the globe are at risk of developing severe COVID-19
Some people are more at risk than others.
Around 1 in 5 people across the world have underlying conditions that put them at risk of developing severe COVID-19 if infected with the coronavirus, according to a new study. That adds up to around 1.7 billion people worldwide.
The novel coronavirus has infected more than 8 million people globally and killed more than 437,900, according to the latest numbers from the Johns Hopkins dashboard. The virus has severely impacted some people, while causing only mild or no symptoms in others, according to a previous Live Science report.
Studies are finding that underlying conditions, age and poverty are all factors that could cause more severe disease. For example, researchers reported yesterday (June 15) in the journal Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report that rates of hospitalizations are six times higher and rates of death were 12 times higher in COVID-19 patients in the U.S. with underlying conditions, the most common of which were heart disease, diabetes and chronic lung disease.
Now, a group of researchers has focused specifically on how underlying conditions will impact the outcome of the virus on the world's population.
Related: 13 coronavirus myths busted by science
To estimate the risk of severe disease, researchers analyzed several datasets including data from 188 countries reported in a 2017 study that analyzed the global burden of diseases, injuries and risk factors and data from a United Nations population estimate for 2020, according to the report.
Using guidelines from the World Health Organization and agencies in the U.K. and U.S., the authors grouped the underlying conditions that most affected the risk of severe COVID-19 into 11 categories: cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic respiratory disease, chronic liver disease, diabetes, cancers with direct immunosuppression (suppression of the body's immune response due to the cancer), cancers without direct immunosuppression but with possible immunosuppression from treatment, HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, chronic neurological disorders and sickle cell disorders.
They found that around 22% of the world's population had at least one underlying condition that put them at risk of developing severe COVID-19. Less than 5% of people younger than 20 reported these underlying conditions; that number jumped to more than 66% of those over 70 years of age, the authors found.
What's more, an estimated 1 in 25 people, or 349 million people worldwide, are at risk of severe COVID-19 and would require hospitalization if infected, according to the findings. Again, the risk increased with age: less than 1% of people younger than 20 and around 20% of those 70 and older would require hospitalization, the authors found.
The authors found that the risk of a severe infection was highest in countries with older populations, African countries with high rates of HIV/AIDS and small islands that have high diabetes rates, according to the report.
A "strength" of their model is that it can be modified as new data emerges and "allows for the much needed further stratification of risk to inform a precision public health approach," researchers who were not involved in the study wrote in an accompanying commentary. However, the authors have identified some limitations to their approach, including the fact that they didn't consider age as an independent risk factor in predicting disease severity. In other words, they didn't include healthy older individuals without underlying health conditions in their tallies, according to The New York Times.
What's more, their estimates don't include other prominent risk factors such as ethnicity, poverty and obesity, according to the report. So, "our estimates are uncertain and focus on underlying conditions rather than other risk factors ... but provide a starting point for considering the number of individuals that might need to be shielded or vaccinated as the global pandemic unfolds," the authors wrote in the study.
The findings were published yesterday (June 16) in the journal The Lancet Global Health.
- 11 surprising facts about the respiratory system
- The 9 deadliest viruses on Earth
- 28 devastating infectious diseases
Originally published on Live Science.
OFFER: Save 45% on 'How It Works' 'All About Space' and 'All About History'!
For a limited time, you can take out a digital subscription to any of our best-selling science magazines for just $2.38 per month, or 45% off the standard price for the first three months.
Live Science newsletter
Stay up to date on the latest science news by signing up for our Essentials newsletter.
Yasemin is a staff writer at Live Science, covering health, neuroscience and biology. Her work has appeared in Scientific American, Science and the San Jose Mercury News. She has a bachelor's degree in biomedical engineering from the University of Connecticut and a graduate certificate in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.
SparkyWell if there is a huge spike it will because of all the people improperly using masks. What all these people are doing to themselves is reinhaling co2 lowering their immune system, putting them at a much higher risk of catching a virus. They will cause what they are trying to prevent. If you must wear a mask only wear one when in CLOSE proximity of another person/people. Other than that you should not be wearing one at all!! And wearing a mask is not protecting you but protect those around you from what you may have. It does not work the other way around unless you are wearing a filtered respirator. Then you are actually preventing external contaminates from being inhaled.Reply
SparkyI do agree with the fashion statement. I do recommend still using one if not just for the psyche. This virus has everything upside down and the fear is still very strong and alive. I see people wearing masks while driving their own vehicle. What are they protecting themselves from? I see people walking along the road or in parks wearing a mask. How does one fight a fear like that?Reply
By Ben Turner
By Robert Lea