NASA engineers discover why Voyager 1 is sending a stream of gibberish from outside our solar system

An artist's illustration of Voyager 1 with its antenna pointed back at Earth.
An artist's illustration of Voyager 1 with its antenna pointed back at Earth. (Image credit: NASA/JPL)

For the past five months, the Voyager 1 spacecraft has been sending a steady stream of unreadable gibberish back to Earth. Now, NASA engineers finally know why.

The 46-year-old spacecraft sends regular radio signals as it drifts further from our solar system. But in November 2023, the signals suddenly became garbled, meaning  scientists were unable to read any of its data, and they were left mystified about the fault's origins. 

In March, NASA engineers sent a command prompt, or "poke," to the craft to get a readout from its flight data subsystem (FDS) — which packages Voyager 1's science and engineering data before beaming it back to Earth. 

After decoding the spacecraft's response, the engineers have found the source of the problem: The FDS's memory has been corrupted.

Related: NASA's Voyager 1 sends readable message to Earth after 4 nail-biting months of gibberish

"The team suspects that a single chip responsible for storing part of the affected portion of the FDS memory isn't working," NASA said in a blog post Wednesday (March 13). "Engineers can't determine with certainty what caused the issue. Two possibilities are that the chip could have been hit by an energetic particle from space or that it simply may have worn out after 46 years."

Although it may take several months, the engineers say they can find a workaround to run the FDS without the fried chip — restoring the spacecraft's messaging output and enabling it to continue to send readable information from outside our solar system.

Launched in 1977, Voyager 1 zipped past Saturn and Jupiter in 1979 and 1980 before flying out into interstellar space in 2012. It is now recording the conditions outside of the sun's protective magnetic field, or heliosphere, which blankets our solar system.

Voyager 1 is currently more than 15 billion miles (24 billion kilometers) from Earth, and it takes 22.5 hours for any radio signal to travel from the craft to our planet.

Ben Turner
Staff Writer

Ben Turner is a U.K. based staff writer at Live Science. He covers physics and astronomy, among other topics like tech and climate change. He graduated from University College London with a degree in particle physics before training as a journalist. When he's not writing, Ben enjoys reading literature, playing the guitar and embarrassing himself with chess.

  • TorbjornLarsson
    Bon voyage, Voyager!
    Reply
  • Jay McHue
    What if aliens are doing it to try to communicate with us? 🤪
    Reply
  • Commodore Browncoat
    Jay McHue said:
    What if aliens are doing it to try to communicate with us? 🤪
    That's about as sane a theory as many of the others that have become ridiculously popular in the past several years, so sure - why not? What reply do you think we should send?
    Reply
  • sourloaf
    admin said:
    Voyager 1 has been sending a stream of garbled nonsense since November. Now NASA engineers have identified the fault and found a potential workaround.

    NASA engineers discover why Voyager 1 is sending a stream of gibberish from outside our solar system : Read more
    What does FSB mean?
    Reply
  • Rusty Lugnuts
    sourloaf said:
    What does FSB mean?

    Where are you seeing "FSB"?

    The closest thing I can see in the article is "FDS".

    In modern computers, FSB would most likely refer to the Fr0nt S1ide Bu5, though I have no idea if a system as old as Voyagers, let alone engineered so specifically, would have an FSB.
    (apparently I can't spell out "Fr0nt S1ide Bu5" or my post gets flagged as spam or inappropriate??)
    Reply
  • SkidWard
    Rusty Lugnuts said:
    Where are you seeing "FSB"?

    The closest thing I can see in the article is "FDS".

    In modern computers, FSB would most likely refer to the Fr0nt S1ide Bu5, though I have no idea if a system as old as Voyagers, let alone engineered so specifically, would have an FSB.

    (apparently I can't spell out "Fr0nt S1ide Bu5" or my post gets flagged as spam or inappropriate??)
    Please for the love of goodness if you do not want to encourage scammers and hackers you will edit this post or remove this post because what he is inquiring about is one of two things and I strongly advise may not having to tell you the obvious part of curiosity killing the cat and I strongly advise you learn why underclocking needs to be buried in history because it has took me 17 years to realize that I have spent 17 years making the mistake of trying to research it on the internet and all I have done is leave traces of top hacker information inquiries and a novice hacker may not understand those things until later on and by then it is too late and we are stuck in a never-ending cycle simply because you did not take my advice or you did not remind me to remove my post as well if you happen to remove yours. And in the odd chance that the wrong person reads this post before both posts are deleted then let us hope that they do not screenshot it or remember it. What he is inquiring about was the ultimate destruction of a specific video game in which even the professional legit community and the non legit hacker community came together to stand up against underclocking and it was still not successful. So if two opposing sides Joint Forces and it still does no good- then you can understand the severity of what I know and why I prefer to keep my mouth shut and my virtual mouth shut.
    Reply
  • SkidWard
    Just cut the % of ram needed... skip the bad sectors
    Reply
  • kloudykat
    FDS = fl1ght da1a sub5ystem5
    Reply
  • 5ft24dave
    This is pretty old news, like 6 months old. Are you guys just now discovering this?
    Reply
  • Jay McHue
    Commodore Browncoat said:
    That's about as sane a theory as many of the others that have become ridiculously popular in the past several years, so sure - why not? What reply do you think we should send?
    "42." 😁
    Reply