Chinese challenge to "out of Africa" theory

History and science, and the effect they have on each other.

Chinese challenge to "out of Africa" theory

Postby RamblinglyVeryBored » Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:12 pm

A small tidbit of news on the multiregional theory of human evolution. With picture!

Image

Chinese paleontologists claim this 110,000-year-old jawbone is from a Homo sapiens (Image: Institute of Vertebrate Palaeontology and Palaeoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Chinese challenge to 'out of Africa' theory

* 00:01 03 November 2009 by Phil McKenna

The discovery of an early human fossil in southern China may challenge the commonly held idea that modern humans originated out of Africa.

Jin Changzhu and colleagues of the Institute of Vertebrate Palaeontology and Palaeoanthropology in Beijing, announced to Chinese media last week that they have uncovered a 110,000-year-old putative Homo sapiens jawbone from a cave in southern China's Guangxi province.

The mandible has a protruding chin like that of Homo sapiens, but the thickness of the jaw is indicative of more primitive hominins, suggesting that the fossil could derive from interbreeding.

If confirmed, the finding would lend support to the "multiregional hypothesis". This says that modern humans descend from Homo sapiens coming out of Africa who then interbred with more primitive humans on other continents. In contrast, the prevailing "out of Africa" hypothesis holds that modern humans are the direct descendants of people who spread out of Africa to other continents around 100,000 years ago.

The study will appear in Chinese Science Bulletin later this month.
Out of China?

"[This paper] acts to reject the theory that modern humans are of uniquely African origin and supports the notion that emerging African populations mixed with natives they encountered," says Milford Wolpoff, a proponent of the multiregional hypothesis at the University of Michigan.

Others disagreed. Erik Trinkaus, an anthropologist at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, questioned whether the find was a true Homo sapiens.

"You need to keep in mind that 'Homo sapiens' for most Chinese scholars is not limited to anatomically modern humans," he says. "For many of them, it is all 'post Homo erectus,' humans."

Chris Stringer of London's Natural History Museum said that it was too early to make far-reaching conclusions. "From the parts preserved, this fossil could just as likely be related to preceding archaic humans, or even to the Neanderthals, who at times seem to have extended their range towards China."

The present analysis of the mandible focused almost exclusively on determining the fossil's age. The researchers said a follow-up study would give a more complete treatment on what exactly the find represents.

Of course one of the biggest problems with the multiregional hypothesis is, some who believe it claim that we all came from different species. We're all homo sapien, and related in some manner. But that we all evolved from different mixtures of ape-men ... Which to them, accounts for the differences in race. Of course its no longer politically correct to even consider this.

Here I found this, it might make things a bit more clear.
Image
User avatar
RamblinglyVeryBored
organ
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 11:42 am

Re: Chinese challenge to "out of Africa" theory

Postby secularhumanizinevoluter » Wed Nov 11, 2009 10:53 am

Don't know who did your charts but they really need to do a little research. We are NOT descendents of Neanders. TOTALLY differant species. Related but no linear progression.
User avatar
secularhumanizinevoluter
brain
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:38 pm

Re: Chinese challenge to "out of Africa" theory

Postby RamblinglyVeryBored » Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:56 pm

The current accepted theory is we came from African Erectus. The bottom one shows this. The little broken line above the word neanderthal and the arrow just below that show the linage went so far, then ended and is not connected to modern humans.

The only connecting in the bottom one is African Erectus became Modern Africans, Europeans, Asians, and Australians.

That's our current theory we accept and teach.

The top one is what the Chinese & some other scientists believe. The multiregional theory. Every race evolved from a different race of ape-man. Not all from Africa Erectus.
User avatar
RamblinglyVeryBored
organ
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 11:42 am

Re: Chinese challenge to "out of Africa" theory

Postby kristina3313 » Thu Nov 12, 2009 11:09 am

Hey Sec, didn't Ed also spoke about this somewhere here, I just can't find it anymore and I even think that he favored the out of Asia theory, remember... he mentioned Chris Beard before and his views on evolution.
This is one of the articles that I've found with quick online search, it speaks of three newly discovered anthropoid primates and how it might support out of Asia theory.

"Three newly discovered primate species that lived 30 million years ago suggest that our ancestors originated in Asia not Africa, challenging the well-known "Out of Africa" theory of human evolution.
But it could be something a bit more complicated, such as "Out of Asia into Africa and Back to Asia", since some researchers now think Asian primates journeyed to Africa, where they evolved into humans, who then travelled both in and out of Africa."

Here is the link for the full article.

http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/s1381883.htm
User avatar
kristina3313
cell
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:23 am

Re: Chinese challenge to "out of Africa" theory

Postby secularhumanizinevoluter » Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:21 pm

Kristina I don't really see this changing the "out of Africa" angle as far as Humanity goes. Maybe out of Asia for the earlyest common anscester but from everything I've read out of Africa still holds for Humanity. The kaw section is very interesting. Did they find anything else with it?
User avatar
secularhumanizinevoluter
brain
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:38 pm

Return to History