<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ted Turner: Humans Will Become Cannibals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2008/04/03/ted-turner-humans-will-become-cannibals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2008/04/03/ted-turner-humans-will-become-cannibals/</link>
	<description>LiveScience Blogs &#124; Science, Technology, Health &#38; Environmental News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dubephnx</title>
		<link>http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2008/04/03/ted-turner-humans-will-become-cannibals/#comment-52583</link>
		<dc:creator>dubephnx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 07:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2008/04/03/ted-turner-humans-will-become-cannibals/#comment-52583</guid>
		<description>Turner may be correct in his assessment about our planet being too hot to survive on. The way we pollute the water, lands, and air can't be too good for the ecology, and our efforts to reverse these pollutings always seem to be awareness campaigns, that milk our wallets along with recovering from disasters like tsunamis, tornados, hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, wildfires, and so on.

Being stupid enough to see that wiped out buildings, structures, and cars, and the contents of each costs a lot of money to replace, I must be stupid enough to pinpoint a common theme in what these disasters destroy first, and that is the frames and bodies of the buildings, etc. After the frames/bodies go out, things like 8 million cans/bottles of motor oil were deposited in the soils and waters along the path of hurricane Katrina, along with tons of other non-biodegradeable liquids, gasses, and products, for example. 
  
I fully believe that the start point to economic, ecological, and environmental recovery and balancings, is at the first common location, the buildings, etc; frames and bodies. Upgrade them, less pollutants, upgrade them, more money in all our pockets, uprade them, better standards of living, inside and outside of the buildings!!

Upgrading the structural efficiencies of frames and bodies requires a change in the basic principle of building (etc.) design and assembly. All building, etc; frames and bodies are of Anchor and Braced concepts, and can easiliy be switched over to Dual/Triple Netted Structures/Systems, with little development costs, assembly techniques, and design methodologies changes. The resulting changes are proving out to be quite impressive, as all Closed-Netted Structures/Systems can withstand hurricanes, etc. 

The amount of changes in reductions of lost property and lives from hurricanes alone, pays for all transitional changes in development, and you haven't even purchased one of these systems yet!! Robert, interested in doing a story on this new technology?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turner may be correct in his assessment about our planet being too hot to survive on. The way we pollute the water, lands, and air can&#8217;t be too good for the ecology, and our efforts to reverse these pollutings always seem to be awareness campaigns, that milk our wallets along with recovering from disasters like tsunamis, tornados, hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, wildfires, and so on.</p>
<p>Being stupid enough to see that wiped out buildings, structures, and cars, and the contents of each costs a lot of money to replace, I must be stupid enough to pinpoint a common theme in what these disasters destroy first, and that is the frames and bodies of the buildings, etc. After the frames/bodies go out, things like 8 million cans/bottles of motor oil were deposited in the soils and waters along the path of hurricane Katrina, along with tons of other non-biodegradeable liquids, gasses, and products, for example. </p>
<p>I fully believe that the start point to economic, ecological, and environmental recovery and balancings, is at the first common location, the buildings, etc; frames and bodies. Upgrade them, less pollutants, upgrade them, more money in all our pockets, uprade them, better standards of living, inside and outside of the buildings!!</p>
<p>Upgrading the structural efficiencies of frames and bodies requires a change in the basic principle of building (etc.) design and assembly. All building, etc; frames and bodies are of Anchor and Braced concepts, and can easiliy be switched over to Dual/Triple Netted Structures/Systems, with little development costs, assembly techniques, and design methodologies changes. The resulting changes are proving out to be quite impressive, as all Closed-Netted Structures/Systems can withstand hurricanes, etc. </p>
<p>The amount of changes in reductions of lost property and lives from hurricanes alone, pays for all transitional changes in development, and you haven&#8217;t even purchased one of these systems yet!! Robert, interested in doing a story on this new technology?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobzilla</title>
		<link>http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2008/04/03/ted-turner-humans-will-become-cannibals/#comment-50493</link>
		<dc:creator>bobzilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2008/04/03/ted-turner-humans-will-become-cannibals/#comment-50493</guid>
		<description>I went to grammar school with a few Neanderthals. I just didn't sit with them at lunchtime.
I seem to remember that chimpanzees are also over 99% genetically identical to humans, so another possible scenario is that we could learn to use sticks to get termites out of hollow logs and that we could learn to enjoy termite-on-a-stick as a wholesome snack.
But I have the completely unfounded idea that the 0.01 percent of us that is different from all non-human creatures is the part of us that can solve complex problems if we really try.
After all, I just learned how to comment on a LiveScience blog--something that seemed impossible a few days ago.
True optimism isn't in denying that the glass really is half empty.  It's in hoping that there must be SOME way to get a refill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to grammar school with a few Neanderthals. I just didn&#8217;t sit with them at lunchtime.<br />
I seem to remember that chimpanzees are also over 99% genetically identical to humans, so another possible scenario is that we could learn to use sticks to get termites out of hollow logs and that we could learn to enjoy termite-on-a-stick as a wholesome snack.<br />
But I have the completely unfounded idea that the 0.01 percent of us that is different from all non-human creatures is the part of us that can solve complex problems if we really try.<br />
After all, I just learned how to comment on a LiveScience blog&#8211;something that seemed impossible a few days ago.<br />
True optimism isn&#8217;t in denying that the glass really is half empty.  It&#8217;s in hoping that there must be SOME way to get a refill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wyosense</title>
		<link>http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2008/04/03/ted-turner-humans-will-become-cannibals/#comment-50365</link>
		<dc:creator>wyosense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2008/04/03/ted-turner-humans-will-become-cannibals/#comment-50365</guid>
		<description>Christainity has afforded Ted Turner the ability to have his own opinions
He still thinks like a Neanderthal so no wonder his 
opinion voices like this.  And yes Ted people have watched how you handled your buisness and personal life </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christainity has afforded Ted Turner the ability to have his own opinions<br />
He still thinks like a Neanderthal so no wonder his<br />
opinion voices like this.  And yes Ted people have watched how you handled your buisness and personal life</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
