Due to the speed in which the news cycle changes, it’s often very difficult for us here at LiveScience to gauge just how inspiring, how interesting, how controversial the topics we cover actually are.
Every now and then, we seem to touch on a sore point. A topic that really gets stuck in the collective maw.
Case in point: Last week’s revelation that chimps, our long-distant relation in the evolutionary chain, had the gall to be more evolved than us!
Yes, not content to sit around grooming each other and grasping things with their feet, these simian self-starters decided that if anyone was going to get the upper hand on face-gurning and poo-throwing, it was going to be them.
Not so fast, responded many an irate reader: “When you figure out that we as humans rule the world,” e-mailed one, “maybe you will stop wasting your time trying to make your chimps out to be more than they are.”
Wrote another, “you refer to a “chimp/human” split 6 million years ago. If you read the Holy Bible, you will know that God created man in His own image and I can guarantee you that God is NOT a chimp!”
Or my personal favorite: “I believe you meant: ‘Chimps more evolved than journalists,’” sent by the oh-so-clever Lancelot Link.
I just don’t know what it is about the whole “man descended from apes” thing that causes such apoplexy. It’s not just that it’s heresy, it’s as if it’s personal, like we’ve ruined the family reunion, dredged up the family secret and shone a kleiglight on the red-headed kid stuck in a sea of brunettes.
Still, just when the righteous indignation reached its crescendo, Stephen Colbert from Comedy Central’s The Colbert Report chimed in, telling his audience that when he’s driving home late at night he likes “to read LiveScience.com on my laptop computer because I know I won’t fall asleep at the wheel if I’m enraged.”
I mean, it’s not as if we’re a bunch of bible-bashing, secular humanists foisting our reason-driven political and ideological agendas on the public. Though I think maybe that’s how Stephen sees us …
Not at all, we’re just servants to empirically derived facts, that’s all. A motley crew of ink-stained wretches parsing the often byzantine intellectual landscapes that are scientific press releases and coaxing out news that you, our dear readers, can consume.
Despite the name-calling, the condemnation, the innumerable prayers being offered up for our souls, it’s nice to get the feedback. The statistics tell us we have oodles of visitors, but it’s nice to know they’re actually reading; that we’ve hit a nerve. That ideas cause people to question their beliefs is, we think, a good thing. It show us that people care, that they’re engaged.
Or in Stephen’s case, enraged.