<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China ASAT Test? Troubling Debris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2007/01/18/china-asat-test-troubling-debris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2007/01/18/china-asat-test-troubling-debris/</link>
	<description>LiveScience Blogs &#124; Science, Technology, Health &#38; Environmental News</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: vandernoot</title>
		<link>http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2007/01/18/china-asat-test-troubling-debris/#comment-4422</link>
		<dc:creator>vandernoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2007/01/18/china-asat-test-troubling-debris/#comment-4422</guid>
		<description>Back in Oct. 1957, America was scared from a new "Red Moon" in orbit.  The fear was that the Soviets could at any time, drop a bomb on any America city.  That satellite, Sputnik, drove us into studying the sciences, creating NASA, and pushed us into the space race to the moon.  The problem with the fear was that the Soviets back then, were very far from being able to drop any bombs on us with any accuracy.

Now China has given us a new demonstration of an actual and lethally accurate threat.  But I don't believe that America has waken up to this concept yet.  So take a moment to consider some of the implications of this:

- A large hurricane is found to be bearing down towards a heavily populated region in the country.  As folks are awaiting the latest tracking updates, suddenly there is no communication from the weather satellite.

- Our technically trained and dependent troops are on the battlefield in the midst of action, when their GPS and computer links go dead.

- A nation, jealous of our most prized satellites such as the Hubble ST or the ISS, does not want to hear of another wonderous discovery, and so its kill satellite "accidentelly" malfunctions...

- After many rounds of target practicing, a deadly zone of high speed debris of shrapnel exists in orbit, that puts any astronaut's life at risk if they try to fly through the zone.

We have a U.N. Space treaty that prohibts putting any weapons in space.  What is the penalities for violating this treaty?  And when does the folks of the technically dependent U.S. begin to realize that a satellite is more than just a piece of robotic hardware in orbit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in Oct. 1957, America was scared from a new &#8220;Red Moon&#8221; in orbit.  The fear was that the Soviets could at any time, drop a bomb on any America city.  That satellite, Sputnik, drove us into studying the sciences, creating NASA, and pushed us into the space race to the moon.  The problem with the fear was that the Soviets back then, were very far from being able to drop any bombs on us with any accuracy.</p>
<p>Now China has given us a new demonstration of an actual and lethally accurate threat.  But I don&#8217;t believe that America has waken up to this concept yet.  So take a moment to consider some of the implications of this:</p>
<p>- A large hurricane is found to be bearing down towards a heavily populated region in the country.  As folks are awaiting the latest tracking updates, suddenly there is no communication from the weather satellite.</p>
<p>- Our technically trained and dependent troops are on the battlefield in the midst of action, when their GPS and computer links go dead.</p>
<p>- A nation, jealous of our most prized satellites such as the Hubble ST or the ISS, does not want to hear of another wonderous discovery, and so its kill satellite &#8220;accidentelly&#8221; malfunctions&#8230;</p>
<p>- After many rounds of target practicing, a deadly zone of high speed debris of shrapnel exists in orbit, that puts any astronaut&#8217;s life at risk if they try to fly through the zone.</p>
<p>We have a U.N. Space treaty that prohibts putting any weapons in space.  What is the penalities for violating this treaty?  And when does the folks of the technically dependent U.S. begin to realize that a satellite is more than just a piece of robotic hardware in orbit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockteer</title>
		<link>http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2007/01/18/china-asat-test-troubling-debris/#comment-4379</link>
		<dc:creator>rockteer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2007/01/18/china-asat-test-troubling-debris/#comment-4379</guid>
		<description>Time.com posted a piece about the ASAT test and how the "Chinese" aren't exactly monolithic.  That said, the gravity of this test (pun intended) really ought to bring about an explanation from the government of China.  But one success out of four does not to me indicate the existence of a fearsome new capability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time.com posted a piece about the ASAT test and how the &#8220;Chinese&#8221; aren&#8217;t exactly monolithic.  That said, the gravity of this test (pun intended) really ought to bring about an explanation from the government of China.  But one success out of four does not to me indicate the existence of a fearsome new capability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyclonebuster</title>
		<link>http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2007/01/18/china-asat-test-troubling-debris/#comment-4349</link>
		<dc:creator>cyclonebuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2007/01/18/china-asat-test-troubling-debris/#comment-4349</guid>
		<description>WOW! how do we know they didn't test it on our last shuttle that broke up  into hundreds and hundreds of pieces?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW! how do we know they didn&#8217;t test it on our last shuttle that broke up  into hundreds and hundreds of pieces?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
