<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Story Behind the Nobel Prize</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2006/10/29/the-story-behind-the-nobel-prize/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2006/10/29/the-story-behind-the-nobel-prize/</link>
	<description>LiveScience Blogs &#124; Science, Technology, Health &#38; Environmental News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: nightbat</title>
		<link>http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2006/10/29/the-story-behind-the-nobel-prize/#comment-2176</link>
		<dc:creator>nightbat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2006/10/29/the-story-behind-the-nobel-prize/#comment-2176</guid>
		<description>Nightbat

Any time someone is nominated and awarded an Nobel Prize congrads are in order however the Big Bang Theory was negated by the premise fact that point energy cannot be created nor destroyed.  Therefore attempting to tie the cosmic background radiation curve as proof of pointing BB theory basis is faulty. It is an attempt to make the observed radiation findings try to match an none real world possibility. The background radition is there but not due to energy origination but recycled perpetual non uniform momentum. The disturbed present background field has never existed in pure uniform momentum within our spacetime hence the missing frame long sought by profound scientists. To try to infer by mathematical statistical analysis of correlating radiation curve to energy origination per heart of Big Bang Theory premise is therefore self falsifying.

       the nightbat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nightbat</p>
<p>Any time someone is nominated and awarded an Nobel Prize congrads are in order however the Big Bang Theory was negated by the premise fact that point energy cannot be created nor destroyed.  Therefore attempting to tie the cosmic background radiation curve as proof of pointing BB theory basis is faulty. It is an attempt to make the observed radiation findings try to match an none real world possibility. The background radition is there but not due to energy origination but recycled perpetual non uniform momentum. The disturbed present background field has never existed in pure uniform momentum within our spacetime hence the missing frame long sought by profound scientists. To try to infer by mathematical statistical analysis of correlating radiation curve to energy origination per heart of Big Bang Theory premise is therefore self falsifying.</p>
<p>       the nightbat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
